1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 102 Md.
  5. 102 Md. App. 691 (1995)
 

CROMWELL v. WARD

No. 617, September Term, 1994.

102 Md. App. 691 (1995)

DAVID CROMWELL, ET AL. v. ARTHUR THOMAS WARD, III.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 4, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Paul Smith (Thomas G. Bodie and Bodie, Nagle, Dolina, Smith & Hobbs, P.A., on the brief), Towson, for appellants.

Newton A. Williams (Nolan, Plumhoff & Williams, Chtd., on the brief), Towson, for appellee.

Argued before WENNER, CATHELL and MURPHY, JJ.

CATHELL, Judge.

Appellant, David Cromwell, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Daniels, J., presiding) affirming the order of the Board of Appeals granting a height variance for an accessory building already built by appellee, Arthur Thomas Ward, III. Appellant poses the following questions:

I. Whether the self-imposed or self-created hardship discussed in the Maryland case law on variances requires an intentional act, such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases