Ordered the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the introduction of rebuttal testimony was improper is without merit. The defendant testified on direct and cross-examination that he was not knowledgeable about guns. This testimony was important to his justification defense. The rebuttal testimony showed that weapons and ammunition were found in the defendant's apartment. Thus, such testimony was not collateral, but rather was directed at the validity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
