Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Initially it is noted that the defendant's claim that the trial court's jury charge on identification was prejudicial was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.