SEITZ v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 94-0119.

184 Ariz. 599 (1995)

911 P.2d 605

Charles SEITZ, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Arid Roofing, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied February 21, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurth & Kurth, P.C. by Dennis R. Kurth, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Peter C. Kilgard, Chief Counsel, State Compensation Fund by Kirk A. Barberich, Phoenix, for respondents Employer and Carrier.

Anita R. Valainis, Chief Counsel, the Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.


OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

Before sustaining the industrial injury that gives rise to this claim, Claimant agreed with his employer to reject workers' compensation in exchange for an alternative package of private insurance. Claimant now seeks rescission, alleging that the employer breached its promise to include disability insurance in the alternative package. The Industrial Commission rejected Claimant's position. We set aside the Commission's decision upon review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases