Defendant failed to appear at his scheduled sentencing proceeding. In the interim, defendant had been re-arrested twice before the scheduled sentencing, and several times in the interim between the scheduled sentencing and the adjourned sentencing, thereby violating the no-arrest condition of the plea. Since defendant never challenged the validity of those arrests, it was not incumbent on the court sua sponte to inquire into their validity (cf., People v...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
