SEMPIER v. JOHNSON & HIGGINS

No. 94-5208.

45 F.3d 724 (1995)

Burt N. SEMPIER, Appellant, v. JOHNSON & HIGGINS.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided January 6, 1995.

Sur Petition for Rehearing With Suggestion for Rehearing February 14, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Waskevich, Jr. (argued), Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, Morristown, NJ, for appellant.

John F. Cannon, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, Francis X. Dee (argued), Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, NJ, for appellee.

Before: BECKER, COWEN and GARTH, Circuit Judges.


Sur Petition for Panel Rehearing With Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc February 14, 1995.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

On March 9, 1994, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Johnson & Higgins ("J & H"), the employer of appellant Burt Sempier. Sempier now appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") claim, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (1988),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases