1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 140 N.J.
  5. 140 N.J. 623 (1995)
 

CRAIG v. SUBURBAN CABLEVISION

140 N.J. 623 (1995)

660 A.2d 505

WILLIAM CRAIG, ELLEN CHAPMAN, WILLIAM DENINO AND ELLEN MARSILLO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND SUSAN CHAPMAN, PLAINTIFF, v. SUBURBAN CABLEVISION, INC., FRANK DEJOY, JANE BULMAN, AND GREGORY VANDERVORT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth argued the cause for appellants (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).

Gerald Jay Resnick argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether plaintiffs, William Craig, Ellen Chapman, William Denino, and Ellen Marsillo, have standing to sue Suburban Cablevision, Inc. (Suburban) and the individual defendants for a retaliatory discharge in violation of N.J.S.A. 10:5-12d. The Law Division ruled that plaintiffs did not have standing, and the Appellate Division reversed. 274 N.J.Super. 303...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases