1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 661 So.2d
  5. 661 So.2d 101 (1995)
 

HENDERSON v. MICKELSON

No. 94-2661.

661 So.2d 101 (1995)

James L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Stacey MICKELSON, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied October 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Henderson, Lowell, pro se.

Christopher C. Ford of Ford & Associates, Tavares, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The findings and decision of the trial court are presumed correct, and Henderson, as the appellant, had the burden of demonstrating error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Although there is no record of the trial proceeding, Henderson could have availed himself of rule 9.200(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, by submitting a statement of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases