MENDOLIA v. SAAD


214 A.D.2d 547 (1995)

625 N.Y.S.2d 914

Janet Mendolia et al., Appellants, v. Mayer J. Saad, Defendant, and Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 3, 1995


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that any claims based upon the injured plaintiff's ingestion of drugs that preceded the commencement of this action by more than three years were time-barred (see, CPLR 203 [a]; 214 [5]; Thornton v Roosevelt Hosp., 47 N.Y.2d 780, see also; Snyder v Town Insulation, 81 N.Y.2d 429

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases