WENDLING v. N.J. RACING COM'N


279 N.J. Super. 477 (1995)

653 A.2d 582

RONALD C. WENDLING, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Gies, attorney for appellant.

Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Mary C. Jacobson and Debbie J. Thompson, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, KESTIN and ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ.


The Opinion of the court was delivered by ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ, J.A.D.

The issue presented is whether the New Jersey Racing Commission (Commission) has the authority to discipline a licensed trainer who violates N.J.A.C. 13:70-20.9 by hiring a suspended jockey for a job which is exempt from the licensing requirement. We hold that it does and affirm the Commission's final decision fining Ronald C. Wendling $500. We reject Wendling's argument that N.J.A.C.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases