To the extent defendant entered appropriate objections during the prosecutor's summation, the trial court sustained them and, sua sponte, instructed the jury regarding the burden of proof. Those instructions were repeated and expounded upon during the main charge to the jury. Thus, any possible prejudice to defendant arising from the prosecutor's summation comments was effectively eliminated by the trial court's instructions (see, People v Rose,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CANTEL
211 A.D.2d 536 (1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 869
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eduardo Cantel, Also Known as Eduardo Cancel, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 24, 1995
January 24, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
