1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 73 Ohio
  5. 73 Ohio St.3d 671 (1995)
 

HAUSMAN v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. 94-349.

73 Ohio St.3d 671 (1995)

HAUSMAN ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS; BANCOHIO NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cole Co., L.P.A., Leland D. Cole and Mark H. Ludwig, for appellees and cross-appellants, Harry G. Hausman et al.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Joseph D. Lonardo and Martyn T. Brodnik, for appellee and cross-appellee, BancOhio National Bank.

J. Anthony Sawyer, Director of Law, and Steven R. Milby, Senior Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee, city of Dayton.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Douglas O. Cooper, Kenton L. Kuehnle and Margaret R. Carmany, urging affirmance for amici curiae, Ohio Mortgage Bankers Association, Ohio Bankers Association and Ohio League of Financial Institutions.

MOYER, C.J.

In this case, we are asked to determine whether, pursuant to R.C.G.O. 152.01, BancOhio is an "owner" of the property at issue and liable for nuisance abatement.

Dayton's nuisance ordinance R.C.G.O. 152.01 defines "owner" as including: "The owner(s) of record of the premises of fee or lesser estate therein, a mortgagee, vendee in possession, land contract purchaser, assignee of rents, receiver, executor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases