U.S. v. ANDERSON

No. 200, 1995.

669 A.2d 73 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Danny L. ANDERSON, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: November 22, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory M. Sleet, United States Attorney, and Patricia C. Hannigan (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Wilmington, for Appellant.

Richard P.S. Hannum and Julie Sandler of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, and Michael W. Wagman (argued), pro hac vice, of Wagman, Ashworth, Kreider & Wright, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, C.J., HARTNETT and BERGER, JJ.


VEASEY, Chief Justice:

The following questions of law have been certified by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to Article IV, Section 11(9), of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41:

I. Recovery for Increased Risk of Harm Viewed as a Present Change in Position

a. May a plaintiff who successfully asserts a claim pursuant to 18 Del.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases