1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 283 N.J.
  5. 283 N.J. Super. 452 (1995)
 

SMITH v. TOWNSHIP OF ANDOVER

283 N.J. Super. 452 (1995)

662 A.2d 582

GEORGE R. SMITH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF ANDOVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RICHARD O. MATTOON, II, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF PEAPACK AND GLADSTONE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 9, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald L. Dorf argued the cause for appellant Tp. of Andover (Dorf & Dorf, attorneys; Mr. Dorf and Richard B. Robins, on the brief).

Donald R. Belsole argued the cause for respondent Smith (Alfred J. Villoresi, on the brief).

Richard C. Wischusen argued the cause for respondent Borough of Peapack and Gladstone (Fitzpatrick, Reilly, Supple & Gaul, attorneys; Mr. Wischusen, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, LONG and P.G. LEVY.

PER CURIAM.

The issue in these appeals, which we have consolidated for the purpose of this opinion, is how to interpret N.J.S.A. 40A:14-179 which provides:

Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary whenever there is a police department organized in any political subdivision of this State and a chief of police appointed to be the executive head of such department, the starting salary of said chief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases