1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 649 N.E.2d
  5. 649 N.E.2d 83 (1995)
 

HALL v. InPHOTO SURVEILLANCE CO.

No. 4-94-0864.

649 N.E.2d 83 (1995)

271 Ill.App.3d 852

208 Ill.Dec. 251

Carol HALL, Individually, and Carol Hall and Carl Hall, as Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. InPHOTO SURVEILLANCE CO., Phillip A. McLaughlin, and Scott A. Jackson, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

Decided April 13, 1995.

Rehearing Denied May 15, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Papa (argued), Callis, Papa, Hale, Jensen, Jackstadt, Bailey, Halloran, Granite City, for Carol Hall.

Kevin J. Davlin (argued), Livingstone, Mueller, O'Brien & Davlin, P.C., Springfield, for InPhoto Surveillance Co.

Justice GREEN delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs Carol Hall (Carol) and Carl Hall brought suit against defendants InPhoto Surveillance Company and its agents, Phillip McLaughlin and Scott Jackson, charging them with "intentional violation of plaintiffs' right to privacy" predicated on surveillance activities conducted near plaintiffs' rural residence. Summary judgment was granted to defendants after the trial court found plaintiffs had no evidence to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases