WEINSTOCK v. CITY OF PLANTATION

No. 94-2434.

664 So.2d 66 (1995)

Mark WEINSTOCK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANTATION, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 13, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Marvin B. Nodel of Abramowitz & Pomerantz, Sunrise, for appellant.

Bruce Johnson and Michael R. Piper of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant's third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases