Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record supports the finding that the one-day delay beyond the 90-day time period to serve a notice of claim on behalf of the infant petitioner resulted from the infant's on-going treatment for serious injuries and her parent's concern for the child's condition (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; Matter of Holmes v New York City Hous. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.