1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 511 (1995)
 

CHAROS v. ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL

216 A.D.2d 511 (1995)

628 N.Y.S.2d 566

Thomas Charos, Appellant, v. Esseks, Hefter & Angel et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 26, 1995

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he had sustained any damages as a result of the defendants' alleged legal malpractice. His proof on the issue of damages was speculative and conclusory and, therefore, insufficient to support any recovery on his first cause of action sounding in legal malpractice (see

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases