Evidence in the record supports findings that petitioner, a probationary caseworker with the respondent agency, misrepresented to parole authorities that his violation of the curfew provisions of his work-release program was due to his employment with respondent, and that this failure to be reliable and truthful demonstrates petitioner's unfitness for the position of child caseworker (see, Correction Law § 752 [2]). In the face of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF OKORO v. CITY OF NEW YORK HUMAN RES. ADMIN.
219 A.D.2d 506 (1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 342
In the Matter of Anthony U. Okoro, Appellant, v. City of New York Human Resources Administration, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 19, 1995
September 19, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
