The IAS Court correctly applied the parol evidence rule to preclude evidence of an oral agreement that allegedly modified the rent specified in the parties' sublease, which nowhere provides for a reduction in rent tied to any prospective or potential reduction in rent in the overlease. In the absence of fraud or mutual mistake, parol evidence must be excluded if it contradicts or modifies the terms of an integrated writing (Marine Midland Bank v Thurlow,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CREATIVE WAYS, INC. v. IMAGE MIX, INC.
211 A.D.2d 514 (1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 339
Creative Ways, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. Image Mix, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, and Alno Company, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 19, 1995
January 19, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
