DICKSTEIN v. SARWIL ASSOCS.


221 A.D.2d 496 (1995)

634 N.Y.S.2d 399

Michael Dickstein, Plaintiff, v. Sarwil Associates et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Adt Security Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 20, 1995


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted on the condition that the plaintiff recover damages from the appellants in the main action.

The appellants are conditionally entitled to summary judgment, pending determination of the main action, on their claims for common-law and contractual indemnification against the third-party defendant. Any recovery against the appellants in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases