1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 140 N.J.
  5. 140 N.J. 573 (1995)
 

MITZNER v. LIGHTS 18, INC.

140 N.J. 573 (1995)

660 A.2d 480

MILTON MITZNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LIGHTS 18, INC., DAVID MITZNER AND JOAN MITZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 15, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Cirafesi argued the cause for appellants (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Cirafesi and Linda Lashbrook, of counsel; Ms. Lashbrook and Laura J. Bogaards, on the brief).

Adam Mitzner, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for respondent (Kovacs & Rader, attorneys; Sanford Rader, of counsel; Mr. Mitzner and Mr. Rader, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons stated by the majority members of the Appellate Division in their opinion below, which will be filed herewith and reported at 282 N.J.Super. 355, 660 A.2d 512 (1994). We add these comments.

We agree with our dissenting member, post at 576, 660 A.2d at 481, that this is a "tragic case involving a disagreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases