WILLIAMS v. CIGNA FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC.

No. 94-11030.

56 F.3d 656 (1995)

Arthur H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CIGNA FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rogge Dunn, James E. Davis, Cozen & O'Connor, Dallas, TX, for appellants.

Douglas S. McDowell, Ann Elizabeth Reesman, McGuiness & Williams, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Equal Employment Advisory Cnsl.

Arthur H. Williams, Irving, TX, pro se.

Gabriel Robles, Nancy DeLeon, Robles & Associates, Dallas, TX, for appellees.

Cathy Ventrell-Monsees, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae — American Assoc. of Retired Persons.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and McBRYDE, District Judge.


PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

Arthur H. Williams filed suit against the defendants, collectively referred to as Cigna, alleging age discrimination. Cigna moved for a stay pending arbitration pursuant to Williams' registration agreement with the National Association of Securities Dealers. The district court denied Cigna's motion. We find that Williams' dispute is subject to arbitration and remand for entry of an order staying proceedings pending arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases