ZORBA CONTRACTORS v. HOUSING AUTH.


282 N.J. Super. 430 (1995)

660 A.2d 550

ZORBA CONTRACTORS, INC., PLAINTIFF, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, OSMOSE WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY, WOOD TREATING CORPORATION OF PHILADELPHIA, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 29, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Hocking argued the cause for appellant.

James L. Melhuish argued the cause for respondent Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc. and Wood Treating Corporation of Philadelphia (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Michelle M. Schott, on the brief).

William S. Gyves argued the cause for respondent Georgia-Pacific Corporation (Saiber Schlesinger Satz & Goldstein, attorneys; David J. D'Aloia, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, KESTIN and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ, J.A.D.

The Law Division dismissed consumer fraud claims brought by the Housing Authority of the City of Newark (Authority), concluding that the Authority is not a "person" as defined by N.J.S.A. 56:8-1(d). We reverse and hold that the Authority is a person entitled to pursue a claim under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases