1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 142 N.J.
  5. 142 N.J. 570 (1995)
 

STRUBE v. TRAVELERS INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS

142 N.J. 570 (1995)

667 A.2d 188

NANCY STRUBE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (T.I.L.) INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, WEBSTER M. GRIMM AND C.I.A.P.N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig J. Hubert argued the cause for appellant (Brotman & Graziano, attorneys; Mr. Hubert and Dennis S. Brotman, of counsel and on the brief).

Michele M. Fox argued the cause for respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, etc. (Kenney & Kearney, attorneys; Ms. Fox and Ralph R. Smith, 3rd, on the brief).

C. Edward Speidel argued the cause for respondent Webster H. Grimm, improperly pleaded as Webster M. Grimm (Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola & DiFazio, attorneys).

Marc L. Dembling argued the cause for respondent C.I.A.P.N.J. (Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).

STEIN and COLEMAN, Justices, dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin's dissenting opinion, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases