EM NOMINEE PARTNERSHIP CO. v. ARKLA ENERGY RESOURCES

No. 26,795-CA.

656 So.2d 55 (1995)

EM NOMINEE PARTNERSHIP COMPANY, Quinoco Consolidated Partners, L.P., Quinoco Petroleum, Inc. and QMH Oil & Gas, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARKLA ENERGY RESOURCES, a Division of Arkla, Inc. Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Henri Lapeyre, Jr., Matthew J. Randazzo, III, Lapeyre, Terrell & Randazzo, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Michael E. Riddick, David N. Matlock, Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, for defendant/appellee.

Before MARVIN, STEWART and PRICE (Pro Tempore), JJ.


PRICE, Judge Pro Tempore.

Defendant, Arkla Energy Resources (AER), entered into a compromise agreement on March 1, 1989, purporting to settle all "take or pay" claims under gas purchase contracts with plaintiffs, Quinoco Petroleum, Inc., and its affiliated entities, E.M. Nominee Partnership Company, and Quinoco Consolidated Partners, L.P. (Quinoco) and to settle and dismiss the suit filed by these plaintiffs in Caddo Parish to enforce a prior compromise of claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases