1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 215 A.D.2d
  5. 215 A.D.2d 494 (1995)
 

PEOPLE v. CLARK

215 A.D.2d 494 (1995)

626 N.Y.S.2d 527

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Clark, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 8, 1995

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's present contention that the admission of certain testimony was violative of the parent-child privilege is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as it was not cited as a ground for objection at trial (see, People v Harrell, 59 N.Y.2d 620). In any event, we find no merit to the defendant's argument. The circumstances which may give rise to a parent-child

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases