1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 283 N.J.
  5. 283 N.J. Super. 424 (1995)
 

HAMILTON v. GOV. EMPLOYEES INS. CO.

283 N.J. Super. 424 (1995)

662 A.2d 568

FRIEDA HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur L. Shanker argued the cause for appellant (Weiner and Shanker, attorneys; Mr. Shanker, of counsel and on the brief).

James L.A. Pantages argued the cause for respondent (Stein, Bliablias, McGuire, Pantages and Gigl, attorneys; Mr. Pantages, of counsel; Gregory T. Keller and Mr. Pantages, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, BRAITHWAITE and BILDER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRAITHWAITE, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting summary judgment determining that defendant's New York issued automobile insurance policy does not cover her for claims she is making against her husband based upon a New Jersey accident. We reverse.

On August 18, 1991, plaintiff, Frieda Hamilton, and her husband, Stuart Hamilton, New York residents, were involved in an automobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases