Contrary to defendant's pro se argument, the complainants' line-up and in-court identifications were properly admitted. The evidence at the Wade hearing established that the pretrial identification procedures were not suggestive.
Defendant's guilt of the two robberies was established beyond a reasonable doubt based upon legally sufficient evidence proving his identity as the perpetrator of each crime (People v Mosley,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
