FARRELL v. COMSTOCK GROUP, INC.


211 A.D.2d 493 (1995)

621 N.Y.S.2d 325

Edward P. Farrell, Appellant-Respondent, v. Comstock Group, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 17, 1995


Under CPLR 5001 (b), interest is to be computed from the earliest ascertainable date the cause of action existed. Here, the fraudulent misrepresentation occurred when plaintiff was fraudulently induced to sign the patent agreements concerning his invention.

Contrary to defendants' contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence of fraudulent inducement was sufficient. Parol evidence was admissible and raised genuine factual issues ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases