In moving to dismiss the indictment for violation of his constitutional and statutory right to a speedy trial, defendant alleged that his right to a speedy trial had been abridged because of the more than 17 month (it was actually 15 months) inexcusable delay that had already occurred, that the delay was primarily attributable to the prosecution's lack of readiness in an attempted robbery case that did not involve any complex issues, that he had been incarcerated the entire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
