PEOPLE v. VAN DYKE


214 A.D.2d 468 (1995)

625 N.Y.S.2d 529

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Perry Van Dyke, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 25, 1995


There is no merit to defendant's contention that the prosecutor's response to a grand juror's question as to whether there was physical evidence of rape — "that that should not concern you at this time * * * [and] will be dealt with at a later time, in a different forum" — impaired the integrity of the Grand Jury within the meaning of CPL 210.35 (5) (see, People v Darby, 75 N.Y.2d 449, 454-455). We also reject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases