PER CURIAM.
Based upon our review of the record, we find appellant's argument that his written judgment and sentence as a habitual offender did not conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence to be wholly without merit. The trial court's denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence therefore was not error.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
