Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under count four of the indictment (involving constructive possession of seven glassine envelopes of heroin) (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.