RODRIGUEZ v. CORDASCO


279 N.J. Super. 396 (1995)

652 A.2d 1250

ANDRE RODRIGUEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROSE CORDASCO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ginarte, O'Dwyer, Winograd & Laracuente, attorneys for appellant (Richard M. Winograd, on the brief).

Scanlon & Akin, attorneys for respondent Rose Cordasco (Maria M. Romani, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, HAVEY and CUFF.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

The issue in this appeal is whether a person who feeds stray dogs on her property owes a duty to the public to protect against the danger those animals may present to passersby on an abutting sidewalk. The Law Division held there was no such duty in the case presented and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Rose Cordasco. We agree and affirm.

On appeal, plaintiff Andre Rodriguez argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases