Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the plaintiff alleged and proved that the "enterprise" was distinct from the "pattern of racketeering activity" (18 USC § 1962 [c]; see, United States v Turkette,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.