1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 214 A.D.2d
  5. 214 A.D.2d 456 (1995)
 

ENDERVELT v. SLADE

214 A.D.2d 456 (1995)

625 N.Y.S.2d 210

Belle Endervelt et al., Appellants, v. Edward N. Slade et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 20, 1995

It was not error for the trial court to consider the exclusionary effect of CPLR 4519 for the first time on an in limine application, as the issue was not subject to consideration on the previous motion for summary judgment (Phillips v Kantor & Co., 31 N.Y.2d 307; Tancredi v Mannino, 75 A.D.2d 579). Plaintiffs were properly barred from testifying about any personal communications...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases