While the prosecutor's cross-examination of defendant was improper insofar as it attempted to show that he was a womanizer who committed the murder out of rage when rejected by the victim, there having been no offer of proof to support this line of inquiry, the misconduct resulted only in the introduction of irrelevancies, not uncharged acts or other prior bad acts so potentially prejudicial as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (compare, People v Bagarozy
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RAILEY
214 A.D.2d 455 (1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 213
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Railey, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 20, 1995
April 20, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
