1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 655 N.E.2d
  5. 655 N.E.2d 10 (1995)
 

IN RE FLOYD

No. 5-94-0162.

655 N.E.2d 10 (1995)

274 Ill.App.3d 855

211 Ill.Dec. 350

In re Mark FLOYD, asserted to be a person subject to the administration of psychotropic medication (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Mark Floyd, Respondent-Appellant).

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.

August 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Penelope S. Karnes, Staff Atty., Jeff M. Plesko, Managing Attorney, John B. Lower, Director, Legal Advocacy Service, Guardianship and Advocacy Com'n, Anna, for appellant.

H. Wesley Wilkins, State's Atty., Jonesboro, Norbert J. Goetten, Director, Stephen E. Norris, Deputy Director, Kendra S. Mitchell, Staff Atty., Office of the State's Attys. Appellate Prosecutor, Mt. Vernon, for appellee.

Justice GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court:

Respondent, Mark Floyd, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Union County granting a petition to authorize "blood work to safely monitor the administration of psychotropic medication." The trial court found respondent's refusal to allow the withdrawal of his blood for testing in order to ensure a safe dosage of the psychotropic medication analogous to a refusal to receive psychotropic medication. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases