The jury's verdict was based on legally sufficient, indeed ample evidence that in entering the premises defendant not only defied a lawful order to stay out, but overcame physical resistance to his entry, while harboring the contemporaneous intent to commit an assaultive crime therein. There was also sufficient evidence of a "physical injury" to support the assault count.
Defendant's argument that the court should have further defined unlawful entry, as it relates...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
