We reject defendant's contention that the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence seized from him because we find his pleadings devoid of specific factual allegations supporting his claim that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him (CPL 710.60 [1]; see, People v Mendoza,
Defendant's arguments that the trial court impermissibly interjected itself...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.