MILLS v. J. DAUNORAS CONST., INC.


278 N.J. Super. 373 (1995)

651 A.2d 114

TAYLOR MILLS AND VERONICA MILLS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS, v. J. DAUNORAS CONSTRUCTION, INC., JACK DAUNORAS AND JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 5, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Igor Sturm, attorney for appellant (William C. MacMillan, on the brief).

Horn, Goldberg, Gorny, Daniels, Paarz, Plackter & Weiss, attorneys for respondents (Mark R. Sander, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, KEEFE and HUMPHREYS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Taylor Mills and Veronica Mills (collectively referred to herein as "the Mills") appeal from the entry of a judgment dismissing their claims against J. Daunoras Construction Inc. and Jack Daunoras (collectively referred to herein as Daunoras) with prejudice on the ground that the entire controversy doctrine required the Mills to pursue their claim against Daunoras in a pending arbitration proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases