Defendant claims that the trial court erred in closing the courtroom during the testimony of two undercover officers since the officers failed to articulate specific concerns warranting closure. He also argues that the actions of one of the undercover officers on the day of the hearing were inconsistent with the officer's testimony that his safety would be compromised if his identity were revealed. We find both claims without merit. The courtroom was properly closed in view...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
