The IAS Court, in denying the motion for the appointment of a receiver to operate the adult care facility during the decertification process and in dismissing the complaint, properly determined that plaintiffs had no cognizable private right of action, either actual or implied, under Social Services Law § 460-d to seek the appointment of a temporary receiver. The implication of such a private right of action is entirely inconsistent with the purposes, mechanism and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
