1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 217 A.D.2d
  5. 217 A.D.2d 417 (1995)
 

P.A. BLDG. CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

217 A.D.2d 417 (1995)

629 N.Y.S.2d 240

P.A. Building Company, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 6, 1995

There was nothing in the lease agreement between plaintiff and defendant the City of New York ("City") which prevented the City from designating an agent (defendant Kislak) to conduct audits of certain lease expenses. Although plaintiff contends that the agreement between the City and defendant the Kislak Company ("Kislak") is illegal, on the grounds that certified public accountants may not charge a contingency fee (8 NYCRR 29.10 [a] [6]), plaintiff does not have standing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases