Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the complainant's testimony was not bolstered by the testimony of the executive director of the agency that ran the group home where the complainant lived. The executive director did not testify about the contents of a letter that the complainant had sent to the defendant, nor did she testify about what the complainant had told her during a meeting. In addition, the director's testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
