Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court did not err in denying the branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the undercover officer's identification of a photograph of the defendant. The record indicates that the identification was made by a trained police officer who had viewed the defendant for several minutes during the January 11, 1993, hand-to-hand transaction. In addition, the officer had seen the defendant on the street...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
