MAHARAJ v. FARKAS


220 A.D.2d 391 (1995)

632 N.Y.S.2d 470

Oumadatt Maharaj et al., Respondents, v. Tibor G. Farkas, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 2, 1995


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, where the action was not marked off the calendar due to any default on the plaintiffs' part, the motion to restore was brought within one year of the date the case was marked off the calendar, and the physician's affidavit annexed to the plaintiffs' moving papers constituted a sufficient affidavit of merit, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to grant a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases