HENISER v. FRANKENMUTH MUT. INS. CO.

Docket No. 97462, (Calendar No. 4).

449 Mich. 155 (1995)

534 N.W.2d 502

HENISER v. FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cholette, Perkins & Buchanan (by Bruce M. Bieneman and Robert A. Kamp) for the plaintiff.

Morrison, Mahoney & Miller (by Phillip K. Yeager and Meigs M. Day) for the defendant.


BOYLE, J.

The question presented is whether the homeowner's insurance policy in this case provides coverage for the destruction of the insured's building. We hold that the policy is unambiguous, that the destruction of the building does not fall within the scope of the policy, and thus affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff Heniser and his wife purchased a vacation home in Honor, Michigan. The couple...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases