FARRIS v. DAIGLE

No. 93-605.

139 N.H. 453 (1995)

JOHN FARRIS v. MARK DAIGLE

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

March 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of David M. Groff, of Pelham (David M. Groff on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Mark M. Daigle, by brief and orally, pro se.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

BATCHELDER, J.

The plaintiff, John Farris, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Goode, J.) denying his request that court costs and statutory interest should be added to an arbitrators' award. He argues that the trial court erred in refusing to consider an exact copy of a letter transmitted and reproduced via facsimile (fax) purportedly signed by the defendant's then-counsel agreeing to payment of statutory interest and costs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases